a. "In the facts of this case, we believe the district
court correctly held that appellants had no vested right to application of sperseded
zoning regulations [not yet formally abrogated], and that the ordinances in effect
when the court ruled [pending at time of denial of permit by TRPA] were controlling."
Kings Castle v. Washoe Co. Bd. Comm'rs, 88 Nev.
557, 559, 502 P.2d 103 (1972). No. 14.
b. "Although there exists a minority of authority to the contrary,
administrative agencies may refuse to issue permits which conflict with pending
zoning ordinances not yet in effect. If the aggrieved party had actual or constructive
knowledge of the pending zoning change and there was in fact a new zoning ordinance
pending that was likely to become effective in a relatively short period of time,
the denial of permits authorizing a use not conforming to the pending zoning scheme
Williams v. Griffin, 91 Nev. 743, 745, 542 P.2d
732 (1975). No. 19.