1. Where the City had occupied the property as a street, and
there was no final order of condemnation or determination of compensation, the
S.Ct. reversed the dismissal for failure to proceed with diligence, even though
the landowner allowed "several years" to pass after a trial continuance. [No explanation.
Constitutional supremacy? (c.g.)] LaPratt v. City
of North Las Vegas, 91 Nev. 362, 535 P.2d 795 (1975) (#51)